🎯 Task-SpecificVerified

Bill Sieve - AI Utility Analyzer Model

Utility Analyzer

by Neurometric📄 Document Intelligence

Bill-Sieve is a task-specific model that extracts usage data (kWh, gallons) and billing cycles from utility statements.

Bill Sieve is designed for Document Intelligence workflows where speed, consistency, and control matter more than generic creativity. Instead of relying on a broad model to guess intent each time, this task-specific SLM is optimized for utility analyzer and predictable output quality. That makes it easier to adopt in production pipelines where teams need reliable formatting, lower latency, and reduced hallucination risk.

Most teams integrate CRM records, internal docs, and workflow tools to automate repetitive language-heavy tasks with predictable outputs. This makes deployment practical for sales ops, customer success, legal, and operations teams that need answers grounded in their own data. Because the model is small and focused, teams can run it with efficient infrastructure while still meeting quality targets for the use case.

Compared with general-purpose models, focused SLMs like this one typically deliver better precision for narrow tasks, lower cost per request, and easier governance. You can start with the free tier, test the model against your business data, and scale usage through Neurometric APIs or ClawPack workflows when performance meets your benchmark.

Q

Model: Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507

This task-specific SLM uses Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 with a specialized system prompt. The model weights are identical to the base Qwen model — the task specialization comes from the system prompt and has been validated through our testing pipeline. Need better accuracy? We can fine-tune the model on your data for your specific use case.

Quickstart

Copy-paste code to use Bill-Sieve in your project

from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(
  base_url="https://api.neurometric.ai/v1",
  api_key="YOUR_API_KEY"
)

resp = client.chat.completions.create(
  model="neurometric/bill-sieve",
  messages=[
    {"role": "user",
     "content": "{\n  \"tables\": [\n    {\n      \"usage\": \"1,204 kWh\",\n      \"period\": \"03/01/2025-03/31/2025\",\n      \"service\": \"electric\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"usage\": \"58 gallons equivalent\",\n      \"period\": \"03/05/20..."}
  ]
)
print(resp.choices[0].message.content)
OpenAI SDK compatibleTry in Playground →

Test Results

Example Input

Tables: - Usage: 1,204 kWh; Period: 03/01/2025-03/31/2025; Service: electric - Usage: 58 gallons equivalent; Period: 03/05/2025-04/04/2025; Service: gas Metadata: Account Id: 77889900 Statement Date: 2025-04-06 Statement Text: - Utility Provider: North Valley Energy - Customer #: 77889900 - Electric Meter Read Dates: 03/01/2025 - 03/31/2025 - Electric Usage This Period: 1,204 kWh - Gas Meter Read Dates: 03/05/2025 - 04/04/2025 - Natural Gas Usage: 58 gallons equivalent - Note: Amount due by 04/20/2025

Expected Output

Extractions:

Service: electric; Usage Kwh: 1204; Billing Cycle End: 2025-03-31; Billing Cycle Start: 2025-03-01

Service: gas; Usage Gallons: 58; Billing Cycle End: 2025-04-04; Billing Cycle Start: 2025-03-05

Actual Model Response

Here is the extracted usage data and billing cycle information from the utility statement:

---

Electricity Usage - Period: March 1, 2025 – March 31, 2025 - Usage: 1,204 kWh

Natural Gas Usage - Period: March 5, 2025 – April 4, 2025 - Usage: 58 gallons equivalent

Billing Information - Statement Date: April 6, 2025 - Account ID: 77889900 - Payment Due By: April 20, 2025

---

Let me know if you'd like this formatted for a report, email, or spreadsheet.

Test this model

Sign in to run your own test cases against this model.

Capabilities

extractionspecialized-task

Frequently asked questions

Does Bill Sieve work with CRM systems?

Yes. Bill Sieve is built to work with CRM systems, internal docs, and CSV/JSON pipelines. Most teams connect existing APIs or scheduled exports and map records into prompt-ready JSON.

What data format does this model accept?

You can send plain text or structured JSON. For utility analyzer, teams usually pass normalized records with field names, context notes, and output constraints.

Why use a task-specific SLM for utility analyzer?

Task-specific SLMs are tuned for one business outcome, so they are often more consistent and cost-efficient than general models for repetitive production workflows.

Model Access

From $3/mo

Unlimited API calls

Subscribe

Or subscribe to multiple models from $7/mo

Try This Model

💬

Send a message to try the model

Use via API

Free

View API settings and get a free key. Sign up when you want more keys or billing access.

Need better performance?

We can fine-tune this model on your data for higher accuracy on your specific use case.

Model Info

ModelQwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
Parameters4B
Last Updated2026-03-19